GeneralLink to Body ContentLink to Site Map
Select Area of Interest

Choose topic:
FAQs
Epidemiology
Pathology
Diagnosis
Control
Prevention
Herd/Flock Management
Laws & Regulations
True Cases & Stories
Gallery Graphics
Line
Testing Services
General Information
Glossary
History
Biology of Ml. Paratuberculosis
Antimicrobial Therapy
Zoonotic Potential
Test Your Knowledge
Handouts/Brochures
Presentations
Links
Line
Guestbook
Sponsors & Credits
Ask the Expert
Site Map
Search the Site
Home

HISTORY
JOHNE'S INFORMATION CENTER - University of Wisconsin Ñ School of Veterinary Medicine
University of Wisconsin - School of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin - School of Veterinary Medicine
BIOLOGY
AT A GLANCE



GENERAL
| RESISTANCE | SURVIVAL

(Updated 3/2010)

heading: survival

Survival in surface water

Survival in biofilms

Survival in free living amoebae

Survival in feces applied to the soil surface

Survival in feces injected into soils

Survival in slurry pits and anaerobic digesters

Survival in compost




Compensating for the fact it can seemingly only grow in animals, M. paratuberculosis has developed the ability to persist in the environment for long periods of time waiting for the chance to again infect an animal.


Table Bottom

 

Line

Survival in surface water


Lovell et al. reported in 1944 that after spiking sterilized pond water (pH 5.5) with 0.1, 1.28 or 3.4 mg wet weight of MAP per 100 ml of water and holding it at room temperature the organism was recovered in samples tested monthly for up to 9 months. In 1956 Larsen et al. reported on the survival of M. paratuberculosis in spiked tap water of different pHs (degree of acidity) held at 38 C in the dark. In neutral pH water (7.0) MAP was recovered up to 17 months (517 days) post-inoculation while for pH 5.0 and pH 8.5 water MAP was isolated up to 14 months post-inoculation. Most recently, Whittington et al. in 2005 reported similarly prolonged survival of MAP in water and sediment behind dams. They concluded that water may be a significant reservoir of MAP infection on farms.  Pickup et al. recovered MAP from domestic water reservoirs. (see references below). 

For more general references regarding mycobacteria in water the reader is directed to the review article by C.H. Collins. Subsequent to publication of this review, recognition of the global AIDS epidemic and associated opportunistic M. avium infections led to a resurgence of research interest in this opportunistic mycobacterial pathogen and, in particular, investigations concerning the source of this organism. Most investigations point to domestic water supplies as the source of human M. avium subsp. hominissuis infections due in part to their abundance in the environment, ability to form biofilms in water distribution systems, and their resistance to chlorination.

Line

Survival in biofilms

The ecology of M. paratuberculosis in biofilms (complex communities of microbes, and the slime secreted by these microbes, that cover surfaces of pipes and other surfaces exposed to bacteria-containing fluids) has not been studied until recently. This pathogen readily forms biofilms that may maintain their presence in water distribution systems, increase their resistance to chlorination and serve as hidden sources of contamination in the farm environment.

Livestock watering troughs were the focus of several recent studies. An inoculum of MAP (107/ml) was added to the water in four types of troughs (concrete, plastic, stainless steel and galvanized steel).

After 2 weeks, the organism could not be found suspended in the water, but in each case a biofilm had formed on the trough material with high concentrations of M. paratuberculosis. This in fact had occurred within three days of inoculation, and the organisms persisted for more than 300 days on concrete troughs.

Persistence of M. paratuberculosis was lowest on stainless steel, followed by plastic, galvanized steel and concrete. When 2ppm chlorine was added to the trough water less than 1% of bacteria remained on stainless and galvanized steel trough materials.

To reduce exposure of susceptible animals to M. paratuberculosis on infected farms, the authors recommended best management practices should include cleaning out and removing slime build-up on trough surfaces on a regular basis. In choosing new troughs, stainless steel is recommended.

http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2010/100720.htm

Bolster, C.B., Cook, K.L., Haznedaroglu B., Walter, S. 2009. The Transport of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis through Saturated Aquifer Materials. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 48:307-312

Cook, K.L., Britt, J.S., Bolster, C.B. 2010a. Survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in biofilms on livestock watering trough materials Vet. Micro. 141:103-109

Cook, K.L., Bolster, C.B., Britt, J.S., Rothrock, M. 2010b. Effect of watering trough chlorination on persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis. Bovine Practitioner. 44:69-76.

Line

Survival inside free-living amoeba

MAP & AcanthamoebaLike its closest cousin, M. avium, MAP can infect and replicate in free-living amoeba such as Acanthamoeba. These unicellular organisms common in aquatic environments act as free-living macrophages and potentially offer an ecological niche outside the host animal where MAP replication or at least persistence can occur. Moreover, the virulence of the organism may be enhanced by growth inside these amoebae.  The adjacent image shows MAP inside Acanthamoeba castellanii (Whan et al. BMC Microbiology 6:63, 2006).

Line

Survival in soil, feces and soil-feces mixtures
applied to the surface of fields/pastures

On the subject of environmental survival of MAP, the 1944 publication by Lovell et al. has become a classic reference. A series of studies using naturally infected bovine feces were conducted in which the infected fecal matter was exposed to a variety of natural conditions such as freezing, drying, sunlight, changes in ambient temperature, and rain, with regular attempts to reisolate MAP. In general they found survival of MAP in feces kept outdoors up to 152 to 246 days depending on specific conditions. Drying of soil appeared to shorten survival. The authors recommend considering a pasture contaminated by the organism as a potential source of infection for at least one year given the longevity of MAP. They mention that this supports recommendations of earlier workers (1929-1933). The commonly made statement that MAP survives a year on pastures, found in most literature on Johne's disease, likely originates from the work of Lovell et al.

MAP is resistant to heat, cold, drying and acidic conditions, but does not replicate in the environment.   As an obligate pathogen, MAP in the environment does die off completely, but not quickly.  When a premise is contaminated by MAP-containing manure, approximately 90% are believed to die off within a few months, but MAP in low numbers can be recovered for more than a year.  The relevance of this persistence at low levels to new cases of infection is not known.  In Australia, MAP could be isolated (albeit from fewer and fewer samples over time) from shaded soil (including soil shaded by crops) up to 55 weeks, and in shaded trough water at 48 weeks.  Even greater longevity was noted in trough sediment.  MAP was isolated from grasses germinating through manure-laden soil again in the pattern observed for MAP isolation from soil: greater MAP longevity was seen in grasses grown from completely versus 70% shaded soil boxes (24 versus 9 weeks).  This study’s comparison of shaded versus partially shaded sites led the authors to conclude that diurnal temperature changes was more relevant in hastening complete MAP die-off than was just the UV radiation itself, and that removing vegetation to maximize temperature changes at soil level may be beneficial.  Based on these data Whittington et al. in 2004, contaminated drinking water may remain a reservoir for new infections longer than contaminated ground.  This publication also provides an excellent table of prior research on MAP survival in soil. Other work from that very productive research group published in 2009 demonstrated that MAP can adhere to soil particles and that this is heavily influenced by soil pH.

Factors that may shorten the estimated survival time of MAP in soil are drying, exposure to sunlight, pH above 7.0 and low iron content. Bovine urine is also hostile to M. paratuberculosis survival and increasing concentrations of bovine urine (2-10%) caused decreasing survival rates (at pH 6.3 to 6.6). A 1999 study on MAP survival in spiked soils in Australia found shorter survival in dry alkaline soils and no apparent effect of UV light.

Observations regarding the associations among soil pH, calcium or iron content and the incidence of paratuberculosis have a long history. The 1956 review article on Johne's disease by Doyle covers most of the early observations on association of soil type and paratuberculosis incidence and the 1997 review by Johnson-Ifearulundu complements it by covering more recent literature. The fact that this observed association (i.e. not a proven causal link), in particular concerning soil pH, has been made in England, France, The Netherlands, and the U.S. adds credibility to the idea that somehow soil composition and paratuberculosis are connected. In addition, Johnson-Ilfearulundu and Kaneene recently showed by careful epidemiologic analysis that in the state of Michigan in the U.S. the practice graph illustrating effect of lime use on pastures of application of lime to pastures (a practice that should increase soil pH) in 1993 was associated with ten-fold lower odds of a dairy herd being serologically test-positive for MAP infection in 1996. As an aside, it is interesting to note that in a very different study an association was demonstrated between soil acidity and frequency of skin test reactions (diagnostic tests for exposure or infection with mycobacteria) in humans.

These epidemiological observations have led to speculation concerning mechanisms by which soil pH, or its interaction with soil calcium and iron content, affect MAP survival. It should be noted, however, that the relationships observed are indirect, i.e. simply the association between and incidence of clinical bovine paratuberculosis and broadly characterized soil types. No laboratory studies have been done to verify if a particular soil type affects MAP survival or to explain the mechanism.

Line

Survival of M. paratuberculosis in feces injected into soils

Photo of manure spreaderManure management is a component of domestic agriculture enterprises. Modes of dispersal include spreading it on fields, injection into the soil and slurry pit storage for later dispersal.

No published reports on MAP survival after injection of contaminated feces into soil were found.
Intuitively, the advantage of this practice is that it lessens opportunities for contact between MAP and aPhoto of manure spreadernimals or forage crops and decreases the chance for contamination of surface water by rainfall run-off. However, feces injection might also favor survival of MAP by placing it away from more harsh conditions of drying and sunlight. Other than demonstration of MAP adherence to soil particles as a function of soil pH, minimal research has been conducted in this area.

Line

Survival in feces stored in slurry pits

Jörgensen published the first comprehensive study of its kind on survival of MAP in slurry in Denmark in 1977. In his work he used cattle slurry (pH 8.5, dry matter 7%), swine slurry (pH 8.3, dry matter 8.3%), and a mixture of the two (pH8.4, dry matter 7.7%). After spiking each slurry preparation with 3 x 107 MAP/ml, he bubbled a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen gas through the slurry to secure anaerobic conditions and then stored the slurry at 5°C or 15°C. Jörgensen reported that the number of colonies of M. paratuberculosis isolated on modified Löwenstein-Jensen medium dropped drastically between sampling days 1 and day 7 but then remained relatively stable until recovery of the organism stopped indicating the limit of survival. At 5°C the survival time was 252 days in all three kinds of slurry, and at 15°C it was 182 days in swine slurry, 98 days in cattle slurry, and 168 days in mixed slurry. Comparable findings have been reported on survival of M. bovis in cattle slurry.

The second major study on MAP in slurry was reported by Olsen, Jörgensen and Nansen in 1985. Their study concerned conditions found during anaerobic digestion of slurry as in bio-gas plants. Slurry was spiked to yield initial counts of 3.3 x 103 to 2.7 x 104 MAP /gm slurry and held at mesophilic conditions (moderate temperatures; 35°C or 95°F) or thermophillic conditions (high temperatures; 53-55°C or 127-131°F). At mesophillic conditions MAP was re-isolated at 7, 14, and 21 but not 28 days. At thermophillic conditions viable M. paratuberculosis could not be detected in as short as 3 hours.

Line

Survival in compost

Correctly managed composted organic material may be effective in killing MAP, but research on the topic is limited. This is consistent with time-temperature profiles of properly composted animal waste and thermal survivability characteristics of MAP.

Line

Key References

Collins CH, Grange JM, Yates MD. Mycobacteria in water, 1984. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 57:193-211.

Dhand, N. K., J. A. Toribio, and R. J. Whittington. 2009. Adsorption of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis organisms to soil particles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5581-5585.

Doyle TM. Johne's disease, 1956. Vet Rec 68:869-878.

Falkinham III, J.O., C.D. Norton, and M.W. LeChevallier. 2001. Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 67:1225-1231.

Grewal, S. K., S. Rajeev, S. Sreevatsan, and F. C. Michel, Jr. 2006. Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and other zoonotic pathogens during simulated composting, manure packing, and liquid storage of dairy manure. Appl.Env.Microbiol. 72:565-574.

Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB. Relationship between soil type and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, 1997. J Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:1735-1740.

Jörgensen JB. Survival of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in slurry, 1977. Norsk Vet. Med. 29:267-270.

Lovell R, Levi M , Francis J. Studies on the survival of Johne's bacilli, 1944. J. Comp. Path. 54:120-129.

Mura, M., T. J. Bull, H. Evans, K. Sidi-Boumedine, L. McMinn, G. Rhodes, R. Pickup, and J. Hermon-Taylor. 2006. Replication and long-term persistence of bovine and human strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis within Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl. Env.Microbiol. 72:854-859.

Olsen JE, Jörgensen JB, Nansen P. On the reduction of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine slurry subjected to batch mesophilic or thermophilic anaerobic digestion, 1985. Agricultural Wastes 13:273-280.

Pickup, R. W., Rhodes, G., Sidi-Boumedine, K., Bull, T. J., Weightman, A., Arnott, S., and Hermon-Taylor, J. 2005. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in the catchment and water of the river Taff in South Wales, United Kingdom and its potential relationship to clustering of Crohn's disease in the city of Cardiff. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 71:2130-2139.

Whan, L., I. Grant, and M. Rowe . 2006. Interaction between Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and environmental protozoa. BMC Microbiology 6:63-69.

Whittington, R. J., D. J. Marshall, P. J. Nicholls, I. B. Marsh, and L. A. Reddacliff. 2004. Survival and dormancy of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the environment. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 70:2989-3004.

Whittington, R. J., I. B. Marsh, and L. A. Reddacliff. 2005. Survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dam water and sediment. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 71:5304-5308.


HomeLineBack to Top
Line
Copyright
Line
Contact
Line
Sponsorship
Line
Credits