   






















 






|



|
 


Diagnostic tests are valuable tools used to control the spread of Johne's
disease. It is true however that the biology of this disease makes diagnosis
challenging: again, the animal may not appear ill nor produce consistent,
specific and long-lasting signs of the infection until months after the
infection occurs. This means that test results may be negative although
the animal is truly infected. For instance, a "false
negative" fecal culture test result may occur since the organism
is shed in the manure only intermittently. This means the particular manure
sample collected may not contain M. paratuberculosis. An animal
with this infection may also produce a negative blood test result. This
"false negative" result usually occurs because the element the
test is looking for (antibody)
is not produced by the animal until late in the disease. Since the infected
deer/elk may be at an earlier phase of the infection and has yet to make
any antibody, of course none is found and the test result is negative.
False-positive
results can also occur since other infections may elicit the same response
in the animal as M. paratuberculosis. In deer/elk, this may occur
if the animal is infected with a close relative of M. paratuberculosis
such as M. avium. There are however a number of effective Johne's
disease tests, especially when used on a herd basis and for clinically
affected animals, that have helped animal managers detect and control
this infection.
Blood tests:
The production of antibody is called humoral immunity. In Johne's disease,
this type of immunity neither clears the infection nor slows its progress.
Production of antibody is thought to be a late stage event in the course
of the infection. When it is detected, it is probable that the deer/elk
is showing or soon will show signs of disease and likely is shedding M.
paratuberculosis in its manure and perhaps its milk/colostrum. There
are three blood tests on the market, but they were developed to be used
in cattle. They differ somewhat in their mechanics but each is designed
to accomplish the same thing: detect antibody in serum produced by the
animal in response to M. paratuberculosis infection. None of
these blood tests have been validated for cervid species. The tests
are:
| 1. |
"CF",
or complement fixation assay. The CF test is considered by some authors
to be the least sensitive
of the three. It is often requested as the M. paratuberculosis
infection screening assay for animals being shipped internationally.
|
| 2. |
"AGID",
or agar gel immundiffusion assay. As formulated commercially, this
is a single sample assay with a control well, a sample well and a
central antigen (protoplasmic extract of M. paratuberculosis)
well. A positive result is indicated when a distinct precipitin line
develops between the sample well and the antigen well after 48 hours.
This assay is recommended for sheep and goats (USAHA 2000). The greatest
sensitivity will be found for clinically affected animals. |
| 3. |
"ELISA",
enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. There are at least three commercial
ELISA assays available in the US and a comparable number in other
countries. Each has been validated for bovine species only. In cattle,
the ELISA is more sensitive than the AGID and is used routinely in
the United States for dairy and beef cattle and in Australia to screen
flocks of sheep for M. paratuberculosis infection. A
positive test result in any non-domestic species should raise suspicions
of mycobacterial infection but should not be considered a firm diagnosis
without considering other indications (fecal culture status, clinical
signs, etc.). False positives may occur due to infection with other
mycobacteria (M. avium) or other bacteria (e.g. C. pseudotuberculosis).
|
The current lack
of assay validation means that the ability of the tests to distinguish
accurately between infected and uninfected deer/elk has not been statistically
determined, a process that requires testing hundreds of known-infected
and known-uninfected animals. (Research is underway to accomplish this
for some cervid species. It is not known if an assay that works well for
one cervid species will work equally well for another.)
Despite the lack of assay
validation to date, the ELISA and AGID have been used to provide additional information
about a clinically affected animal. A positive test result on one or both of these
assays raises the index of suspicion, especially if the animal has clinical signs
consistent with Johne's disease and comes from a herd with confirmed cases of
M. paratuberculosis infection. Interpreters of these tests in elk should
always consider the possibility of cross-reacting antibodies caused by an infection
with a different organism. For this reason, blood test positive deer/elk should
be tested by fecal culture to confirm the diagnosis by isolation the organism.
Sample collection:
Blood should be collected in a serum separator or "red top"
tube, centrifuged promptly and the serum submitted to the laboratory.


Isolation of
the organism:
The organism causing
Johne's disease, M. paratuberculosis, can be isolated ("cultured")
from manure or tissues sampled from deer/elk. Because M. paratuberculosis
is one of the slowest growing bacteria, it can take weeks for the organism
to be obtained from the samples.
This
assay provides the most direct "proof" of the infection because
the living organism causing the disease is obtained. The identity of the
organism obtained from the samples is confirmed with a PCR probe for a
genetic insertion element believed to be unique to M. paratuberculosis
(IS900 - see below) or through mycobactin
dependency testing. (Since the organism doesn't grow unless provided a
substance called mycobactin, labs can identify the bacterium using 2 types
of growth media. If the bacteria grows only in media with mycobactin,
it is M. paratuberculosis. If it grows in media with mycobactin
and media without it, the bacteria are not M. paratuberculosis.)
This culture test is used in individual animals to confirm a Johne's disease
diagnosis (based on clinical signs or a blood test) and is also used in
groups of animals to assess the infection status of the herd. Pooling
of samples from 4-5 animals reduces the cost of herd testing, although
pooling may also reduce the sensitivity of the test so that fewer infected
animals may be detected.
Sample Collection:
Approximately one tablespoon of fresh manure should be collected directly from
the rectum or from the ground soon after defecation. It should be placed in a
clean plastic bag that can be sealed, labeled with the animal's ID, kept cool
and shipped overnight to the diagnostic lab.

Identification of
M. paratuberculosis DNA:
A component of genetic material, i.e. an insertion element called IS900,
is believed to occur in M. paratuberculosis DNA only. This insertion element
is therefore used as a marker for infection with this mycobacterial species. PCR
amplification and molecular probes for IS900 can be applied directly to
samples thought to contain the organism (manure, both formalin fixed and fresh
tissue, water, milk, etc. ). The accuracy of this assay depends on the lab performing
it, the type of sample for which the probe was developed and the number of mycobacterial
organisms in the sample.


Effective
surveillance for Johne's disease includes collection of tissue samples
from at least the ileum and mesenteric lymph node(s) (for both microscopic
examination and for culture) from animals dying on-site. Protocols have
been developed to use the PCR IS900 probe with histopathology slides
in some cases. These tissues should be collected even if no lesions are
visible at gross necropsy, especially if there have been any prior confirmed
or suspected cases of Johne's disease in the herd.
While it
may appear taxing to investigate all deaths on site, if there is any possibility
of M. paratuberculosis infection in the herd it is worth the "up-front"
effort to find all cases and block further transmission rather than suffer
the much more costly process of controlling the infection once it has
spread.
|